- The Dilettante's Winterings | At 55°45' N.L.

winterings.netWebsite Profile

Title: The Dilettante's Winterings | At 55°45' N.L.
Description:The Dilettante's Winterings | At 55°45' N.L. Skip to navigation Skip to main content Skip to secondary content Skip to footer The Dilettante's Winterings At 55°45' N.L. About me Executed for treason? is ranked 25408406 in the world (amongst the 40 million domains). A low-numbered rank means that this website gets lots of visitors. This site is relatively popular among users in the united states. It gets 50% of its traffic from the united states .This site is estimated to be worth $2,503. This site has a low Pagerank(0/10). It has 1 backlinks. has 43% seo score. Information

Website /
Website IP Address:
Domain DNS, ranks

Alexa Rank:6461400
EveryoneDomain Rank:2
Google Page Rank:0/10 (Google Pagerank Has Been Closed) Traffic & Earnings

Purchase/Sale Value:$3,150
Daily Revenue:$8
Monthly Revenue:$258
Yearly Revenue:$$3,150
Daily Unique Visitors:794
Monthly Unique Visitors:23,820
Yearly Unique Visitors:289,810 WebSite Httpheader

StatusCode 200
Transfer-Encoding chunked
Connection keep-alive
Vary Accept-Encoding
Cache-Control max-age=604800
Content-Type text/html; charset=UTF-8
Server nginx/1.10.3
Date Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:01:42 GMT WebSite Httpheader

Keyword Count Percentage Similar Website

Domain WebSite Title Dilettante S A L T A N A L A N E S L?S?N?A DO?A :: L A M A N S :: Báo L?ng S?n - Báo L?ng S?n a n n a b e l l e w a s s S L N CNCTECH | Home S A L O N 6 N?L PERDE S?STEMLER? Antakya ?l S?n?r? N L P M S Adana ?l S?n?r? A S*L*M*N AutoBiography N A S E E L ?ifac?l???n S?rlar? ? F L E N S A ? S?a ?i?n L?nh Alexa Rank History Chart aleax Html To Plain Text

The Dilettante's Winterings | At 55°45' N.L. Skip to navigation Skip to main content Skip to secondary content Skip to footer The Dilettante's Winterings At 55°45' N.L. About me Andrew Kramer’s Pulitzer-winning piece: plagiarized or not? 1 April 11, 2017 by AK The New York Times won three Pulitzer prizes yesterday, one awarded… …for international reporting for a series on Russia’s surreptitious assertion of power. The series, a collaboration among The Times’s international, Washington and investigative teams, explored how Russia was expanding its influence at home and abroad. One report from the Times’ Russia’s Dark Arts series is How Russia Recruited Elite Hackers for Its Cyberwar by Andrew E. Kramer. To quote a few sentences from this piece: Mr. Vyarya, 33, a bearded, bespectacled computer programmer who thwarted hackers, said he was suddenly being asked to join a sweeping overhaul of the Russian military last year… “Sorry, I can’t,” Mr. Vyarya said he told an executive at a Russian military contracting firm who had offered him the hacking job… “This is against my principles — and illegal,” he said of the Russian military’s hacking effort. One would think that Andrew Kramer flew to Finland to talk to Vyarya, who has sought asylum in that country. Or, perhaps, Kramer interviewed Vyarya via Skype or phone or e-mail. But did he? There’s no indication of personal communication or correspondence in the piece. Nowhere does Kramer mention meeting Vyarya or speaking to him. Later on, Kramer credits a local source for having first broken the story (more than a year ahead of the Times): …an investigation by Meduza, a Russian news site based in Riga, Latvia, that first disclosed the recruitment effort. He links to one long article by Meduza‘s Daniil Turovsky but neglects to cite another Turovsky piece, an interview with Alexander Vyarya in Helsinki. Had he done so, his debt to Meduza and Turovsky would have been obvious. One can be forgiven for suspecting that Kramer merely repackaged Turovsky’s interview without speaking directly to his subject. (I’d bet that’s exactly what K. did.) Of the two, Turovsky does the better job telling the story of a gifted, self-made Russian cybersecurity professional who refused to become a hacker for a shady but possibly state-sponsored firm and fled abroad. Let’s say it looks like a case of substantial plagiarism, if technically borderline and deniable, as well as a regrettable loss of detail and quality. Oleg Kashin, one of Russia’s best-known political journalists, gives Kramer a pass on plagiarism and blames the global voicelessness of Russian investigative journalists for Kramer’s taking liberties with Meduza‘s original content (the translation is mine): We’re not talking about plagiarism here – Kramer even mentions Meduza (once) as the first publication to write about these hackers – but that’s beside the point. Apart from Turovsky’s texts retold, Kramer’s text has nothing else. Moreover, his retelling incorporates what’s called a presence effect, as if Vyarya had spoken to Kramer about his work in person – and that is, at least, unethical… So Kashin doesn’t think K. ever met V., either. That’s interesting, but Kashin rushes off to mount one of his favorite hobby horses: Doubtless this would have caused a major uproar if the reporter Kramer had been awarded the prize for rewriting articles from American or other, not necessarily Anglophone, newspapers – German, French, first-world more generally. But the Russophone Meduza, even if it starts beating all the drums within its reach, exists beyond the field of vision of the people who award Pulitzer prizes, of Kramer’s editors, of the world’s public opinion generally speaking. Russia is a global periphery, a province, a backwater; no one cares about the grievances of Russian-language authors and their voice is hardly louder than a mouse’s squeak – and that’s doubly paradoxical since the prize was awarded for a series of articles precisely about Russia’s being a formidable and dangerous global player. Well, I don’t really know. Turovsky is only 27 years old but has done some excellent investigative work and had his pieces republished in The Guardian. The question is, does he feel like raising hell about it all, and how do his editors feel? Share this: Facebook Reddit Google LinkedIn Twitter Like this: Like Loading... Category Politics, Russia, US | Tags: Andrew Kramer, Daniil Turovsky, Meduza, New York Times, Oleg Kashin Search for clues by all means, just not in the courtroom 0 April 9, 2017 by AK The Guardian reported on the latest twist in the bizarre trial in Germany known as the NSU-Prozess: Nearly five years into the trial of a German neo-Nazi gang who went on a killing spree against immigrants, relatives of the victims have become so frustrated with the police’s inability to untangle the case they have turned to a an unlikely profession in search of clues: architects. If the cops are unable to untangle a case, they shouldn’t bring it to trial. If the prosecution takes almost five years to make its case, the defendants should be acquitted. This seems an example of the inquisitorial approach at its modern worst, although, as I have read, Germany has adopted some of the best Anglo-Saxon principles and practices. Now relatives of the victims want the judge to investigate the possible role of Germany’s intelligence service in the murders. So far, he has declined: In March [2016], Judge G?tzl took an hour to explain to the courtroom that the task of the NSU trial is simply to judge the accused, not to investigate what German intelligence agents knew or did. That’s only appropriate but does not explain why the judge has allowed this trial to drag on for so long, despite his admirable focus on its central issue. Had the defense insisted on such an investigation, it might have been necessary since the secret services’ involvement might have diminished the defendants’ responsibility, even to zero. When the victims’ relatives request the same, they are essentially asking the court to give an exhaustive answer to the simple question, “What really happened?” But the court cannot be expected to divert its limited resources to this quest beyond what is directly relevant to the question of the defendants’ guilt. Once courts start digging for the whole truth, no one can expect a fair and speedy trial (and a dragged-out trial can’t be fair to the accused). Share this: Facebook Reddit Google LinkedIn Twitter Like this: Like Loading... Category EU | Tags: Beata Zsch?pe, Criminal justice, G?tzl, NSU Prozess, NSU trial The global guillotine 2 April 8, 2017 by AK NBC reported this last Friday: The National Security Council has presented President Donald Trump with options to respond to North Korea’s nuclear program — including putting American nukes in South Korea or killing dictator Kim Jong-un… The second option, “decapitation,” is not limited to removing the one man at the helm of the slave galley: Anothe... Whois

Registry Domain ID: 1760041426_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server:
Registrar URL:
Updated Date: 2014-08-29T07:11:20Z
Creation Date: 2012-11-17T16:23:08Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2017-11-17T16:23:08Z
Registrar: FastDomain Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 1154
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.8017659400
Reseller: BlueHost.Com
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited (
Registry Registrant ID: FAST-18446916
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street: 560 E TIMPANOGOS PKWY
Registrant City: OREM
Registrant State/Province: UTAH
Registrant Postal Code: 84097
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: +1.8017659400
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: WHOIS@BLUEHOST.COM
Registry Admin ID: FAST-18446916
Admin Organization:
Admin Street: 560 E TIMPANOGOS PKWY
Admin City: OREM
Admin State/Province: UTAH
Admin Postal Code: 84097
Admin Country: US
Admin Phone: +1.8017659400
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Registry Tech ID: FAST-18446916
Tech Organization:
Tech Street: 560 E TIMPANOGOS PKWY
Tech City: OREM
Tech State/Province: UTAH
Tech Postal Code: 84097
Tech Country: US
Tech Phone: +1.8017659400
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
DNSSEC: unsigned
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2018-09-24T14:01:42Z

The data contained in, LLC's WhoIs database,
while believed by the company to be reliable, is provided "as is"
with no guarantee or warranties regarding its accuracy. This
information is provided for the sole purpose of assisting you
in obtaining information about domain name registration records.
Any use of this data for any other purpose is expressly forbidden without the prior written
permission of, LLC.By submitting an inquiry,
you agree to these terms of usage and limitations of warranty.In particular,
you agree not to use this data to allow, enable, or otherwise make possible,
dissemination or collection of this data, in part or in its entirety, for any
purpose, such as the transmission of unsolicited advertising and
and solicitations of any kind, including spam.You further agree
not to use this data to enable high volume, automated or robotic electronic
processes designed to collect or compile this data for any purpose,
including mining this data for your own personal or commercial purposes.

Please note: the registrant of the domain name is specified
in the "registrant" section.In most cases,, LLC
is not the registrant of domain names listed in this database.";

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit